(1st part) Analysis & answer of Dr.Zakir Naik's 25 mistake in 5 min



(1st part) Analysis & answer of Dr.Zakir Naik's 25 mistake in 5 min

Recently some people just came forward to prove that Dr. Zakir Naik made more than 25 mistakes in just 5 minute. Interestingly some so-called Muslims did the job. Also a lot of atheists and some Bangladeshi Communist Party members started spreading it with fun, at the same time they are using dirty words against Dr. Zakir.  

Again a lot of the supporters of Dr. Zakir Naik blindly speaking in favor of Naik and also using dirty words against CPB members and the atheists.  
We shall try to analyze all the words uttered by Naik and by the objector. Let’s see the proof of Dr. Zakir Naki's speech and the 25 mistakes. 

kochipost, a web-page published the 25 mistakes here -
 
http://kochipost.com/2013/11/18/zakir-naik-exposed-finally/

WikiIslam, another site published his 29 mistakes here -

http://wikiislam.net/wiki/The_Rising_Star_of_Incompetent_Muslim_Science

Notun-din, a Bengali site translated it in Bengali and put it under a heading, "Kochipost made Dr. Zakir nude". They also claimed that Zakir does 25 mistakes in every 5 minutes. Notun-din's post here-

http://www.notun-din.com/?p=11276

CPB's members took it in great account and began to insult Zakir and his supporters as well as the Muslims in their websites and facebook pages. 
However let’s start analyzing. 

1) First Mistake:  Video reveals, Jakir says, "Darwin visited Kalatropic Island". Mr. Ahmed, the objector says, no, "Darwin visited Galapagos Island". 

 Analysis:  Actually there is no island named Kalatropic. Darwin actually visited Galapagos Island. So Zakir either misspelled it or said wrong. But actually the pronunciation of both the words is all but same. Objector Mr. Ahmed also pronounced the both words same way.

 See the video proof-


  

Decision:  Zakir spelled correctly. It’s not a mistake.
 2) 2nd Mistake: Zakir says, " Darwin saw Birds pecked at niches”. But the objector says, Birds lived at niches”.
Analysis:  Peck means 
            a lot of / plenty / pecking at something to eat / light kiss. So it means that Zakir said the birds living in abundance or eating there in a niche. There is no wrong with the word. Actually the objector could not catch what Zakir meant. 
        But the site notun-din also did mistake to translate it into Bengali. They told, Zakir says, “Darwin saw the birds lived in a single niche". 
But Zakir really didn't say that.

Decision:  Zakir Naik wasn't wrong. 

3)  Third Mistake:  Zakir says, "According to the niche they lived, the shapes and sizes of beak became long and short". But the objector says, Darwin says," Not only the beak but also the size, shape color voice everything may change".
 
Analysis: Zakir only mentioned about the changes of beak size but he didn't say about the other properties. So, it doesn't mean that he did mistake. He mentioned 2 criteria but there are many.

Decision:  Zakir wasn't wrong. But he forgot to speak off all other criteria.

4) Forth Mistake : Zakir says, " Darwin observed the change in only one species of birds".
But the objector says, “Darwin observed it in 14 separate species". 

Analysis: Darwin observed the change in 15 species of Passerine birds. As Darwin observed only Birds, Zakir is right that Darwin observed only one species of birds. Zakir didn’t mistake at all.

Let me give you some information. There are at least 9000 to 10,000 species of Birds. So among these 10,000 species of birds, Darwin analyzed only 15 species. That means Darwin didn’t even analyze one species of birds, rather he analyzed just 0.15% of birds.
If you calculate it among the entire animal species, which accounts about 9 to 10 million species, Darwin analyzed 0.00015% of animals.
Possibly Jakir wanted to say that making report of 100% of animals by the analysis of just 0.00015%  of them is absurd. 
Decision: Jakir naik is 100% correct here, rather a vague complain was made against him.
5) Fifth mistake:  Jakir also said, Charles Darwin wrote a letter to his friend Thomas Thormton”. 
 But the objector says, Darwin had no friend named Thomas Thormton”.
Analysis: Actually no friend of him was found named Thomas Thormton. Possibly he misspelled it. Because, a friend of Darwin was found, named Thomas Wharton, who also spoke against Darwin’s theory. You can find this person in wiki --


Darwin also had another friend, named Thomas Haxley, who personally helped Darwin completing his theory. You can also find this man in Wiki  ---


Jakir may have missed any of these friends’ names with Thomas Thormton.
Decision: Jakir wasn’t wrong but he missed to speak the perfect name.
Click here to read the 2nd part of the analysis

1 comment:


  1. The first revelation that was revealed to the Prophet (peace and blessings of Allaah be upon him) in the cave of Hera was,
    ‘Read, in the name of your Lord Who created.He created man from a clot of congealed blood.'Surah Alaq: 1-2.
    Islamic Quest
    Hazrat Ibn Masood (RA) said, ‘The hypocrite introduces knowledge through his mouth and
    the knowledge of the believer is manifested through his deeds.’He added, "If the possessors of
    knowledge had preserved knowledge and put it in the right place, they would have won over the people of the world.
    "But it is unfortunate that they have handed over their knowledge to the worldly people for the sake of worldly interests.
    As a result, they have been humiliated. -Kitabul Um: 1/156.
    pss:submitblog

    ReplyDelete